Design Research pada Pembelajaran Matematika: Konsep dan Aplikasi

Authors

Iik Nurhikmayati Ratu Sarah Fauziah Iskandar Darhim

Synopsis

SPESIFIKASI BUKU

Harga                    : Rp 65.000

Ukuran                  : 14,8 cm x 21 cm 

Jumlah Halaman : 116 hal

Ketebalan Buku  : 1  cm

ISBN                       : On Proses

Deskripsi Buku   :

Design Research sebagai salah satu pendekatan kajian pendidikan menawarkan cara pandang baru dalam merancang pembelajaran. Melalui karakteristiknya yang siklikal, reflektif, dan berbasis praktik, pendekatan ini memberikan ruang bagi guru maupun peneliti untuk menciptakan inovasi pembelajaran yang adaptif terhadap kondisi peserta didik.

Buku ini membahas pentingnya pembelajaran matematika berbasis Design Research, mulai dari teori dasar, tahapan kajian, serta karakteristiknya. Selain itu, konsep-konsep penting seperti learning obstacle, tetrahedron didaktis, hingga hypothetical learning trajectory (HLT) dan local instruction theory (LIT) diuraikan secara sistematis untuk memberikan pemahaman mendalam.

References

Adelman, C., Ewell, P. T., Gaston, P. L., & Schneider, C. G. (2014). The Degree Qualifications Profile: A Learning-Centered Framework for What College Graduates Should Know and Be Able to Do to Earn the Associate Bachelor’s or Master’s Degree. In Lumina Foundation for Education.

Ahmad, D. N., Astriani, M. M., & Alfahnum, M. (2020). Analisis mengukur kemampuan berpikir kritis melalui pembelajaran menggunakan metode STEAM-PjBL. Prosiding diskusi panel nasional pendidikan matematika, 6(1). Universitas Indrapastra PGRI

Akhmad, Y., Masrukhi, & Indiatmoko, B. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Integrated Project-Based Learning Model STEM to improve the Critical Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students. Educational Management, 9(1), 9–16. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eduman/article/view/35870

Aktoprak, A., & Hursen, C. (2022). A bibliometric and content analysis of critical thinking in primary education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101029

Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills: Literature Review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 19(1), 21-39.

Andrews-Larson, C., Wawro, M., & Zandieh, M. (2017). A hypothetical learning trajectory for conceptualizing matrices as linear transformations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(6), 809–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1276225

Anggraini, N. P., Siagian, T. A., Agustinsa, R., & Indicator, F. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Berbasis AKM. Algoritma Journal of Mathematics Education (AJME), 4(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajme.v4i1.25325

Annisa, A., Suryadi, D., & Rosjanuardi, R. (2018). Design Development of Determinant Lines Materials and Angles on Math Learning for Junior High School. January. https://doi.org/10.2991/incomed-17.2018.1

Aprillia, D., & Rahmawati, I. (2023). Penerapan aktivitas STEAM make craft with 3R (reduce, recycle, reuse) pada materi volume bangun ruang kelas 5 SD. Jurnal kajian Pendidikan guru sekolah dasar, 11(8), 935-947.

Arbain, N., & Shukor, N. A. (2015). The Effects of GeoGebra on Students Achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 208–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.356

Aring, M. (2015). Asean Economic Community 2015: Enchanging Competitiveness and Employability through Skill Development. Bangkok : ILO Publications

Arnellis, A., Suherman, S., & Amalita, N. (2019). Implementasi Learning Trajectory Kalkulus Berbasis Realistic Mathematics Education Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Sma Kota Padang. Menara Ilmu: Jurnal Kajian Dan Kajian Ilmiah, 13(6), 11–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33559/mi.v13i6.1399

Artigue, M., Haspekian, M., & Corblin-Lenfant, A. (2014). Introduction to the theory of didactical situation (TDS). In: Ahsbahs & Prediger (Eds.), Networking of theories as a research pratice in mathematics education (pp.47 – 65). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing

As’ari, R. A., Tohir, M., Valentino, E., Imron, Z., & Taufiq, I. (2017). Matematika SMP/MTs Kelas VIII semester 2 (2ed ed.). Balitbang, Kemendikbud.

Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2020). “It gives you that sense of hope”: An exploration of technology use to mediate student engagement with mathematics. Heliyon, 6(1), e02945. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02945

Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology : a cognitive view. In TA-TT-(2d ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. https://doi.org/LK - https://worldcat.org/title/3516993

Aydogdu, M. Z., & Kesan, C. (2014). A research on geometry problem solving strategies used by elementary mathematics teacher candidates. Online Submission, 4(1), 53-62.

Bakker, A., & van Eerde, D. (2015). An Introduction to Design-Based Research with an Example From Statistics Education BT - Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education: Examples of Methodology and Methods (A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (eds.); pp. 429–466). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_16

Barakos, L., Lujan, V., & Strang, C. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM): catalyzing change amid the confusion. Center on Instruction.

Benyamin, B., Qohar, A., & Sulandra, I. M. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA Kelas X Dalam Memecahkan Masalah SPLTV. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i2.574

Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art education, 65(2), 40-47.

Bissell, A. N., & Lemons, P. P. (2006). A New Method for Assessing Critical Thinking in the Classroom. BioScience, 56(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0066:ANMFAC]2.0.CO;2

Bozkurt Altan, E., & Tan, S. (2021). Concepts of creativity in design based learning in STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(3), 503–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09569-y

Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactiques des mathématiques (1970–1990). (trans: Balacheff N., Cooper M., Sutherland R., Warfield V.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. In N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield (Eds.), Didactique des mathematiques, 1970_1990 (p. 228). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Technology and engineering teacher, 70 (6), 5–9. View at.

Brown, A. E. (2016). Critical thinking to justify an answer in mathematics classrooms. (Doctoral Dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis. Retrieved from Proquest database.

Bybee, R. (2010). Advancing STEM education: a 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30–35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ898909

Cahyani, V. P., & Ahmad, F. (2024). Efektivitas problem based learning terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis, hasil belajar dan motivasi siswa. Venn: Journal of Sustainable Innovation on Education, Mathematics and Natural Sciences, 3(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.53696/venn.v3i2.155

Carperter, J., & Gorg, S. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Castaño, J. P., Arnal-Pastor, M., Pagán-Castaño, E., & Guijarro-García, M. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of the literature on critical thinking: an increasingly important competence for higher education students. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja,36(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2125888

Cesaria, A., & Herman, T. (2019). Learning obstacle in geometry. Journal of engineering science and technology, 14(3), 1271-1280.

Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: The case of geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9173-0

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014). Learning trajectories. Learning over time: Learning trajectories in mathematics education, 1-30.

Cohen J.A., Mannarino A.P., & Deblinger E. (2017). Treating Trauma and Traumatic Grief in Children and Adolescents. New York : The Guilford Press

Couto, A., & Vale, I. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge on elementary geometry concepts. ETEN Annual Conference (2013), 9(2014), 57–73. https://etenjournal.com/peer-reviewed-articlas/archive-articles/2014-in-progress/

Creswell. (2015). Riset Perencanaan, dan evaluasi riset kualitatif dan kuantitatif Pendidikan.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Dalsgaard, P. (2014). Pragmatism and design thinking. International Journal of Design, 8(1), 143-155

Danaryanti, A., & Lestari, A. T. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Matematika Mengacu Pada Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Pada Siswa Kelas Viii Smp Negeri Di Banjarmasin Tengah Tahun Pelajaran 2016/2017. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v5i2.4631

Denzin, Norman K. dan Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds.). 2009. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Terj. Dariyatno dkk. Jogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Dewey, J. (2022). How we think. DigiCat.

Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think (Available). D.C. Heath. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-thinking/index.html

Dong, M., Li, F., & Chang, H. (2023). Trends and hotspots in critical thinking research over the past two decades: Insights from a bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16934

Dores, O. J., Wibowo, D. C., & Susanti, S. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika. J-PiMat : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.31932/j-pimat.v2i2.889

De Coster, I., & Sigalas, E. (2017). Citizenship Education at School in Europe, 2017. Eurydice Brief. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, European Commission. Available from EU Bookshop)

Ennis, R. H. (1985). A The Logical Basis for Measuring CT Skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44–48.

Ennis, R. H., Millman, J., & Tomko, T. N. (1985). Cornell critical thinking tests level X & level Z: Manual. Boise, ID: Midwest Publications

Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.

Er, Z. (2023). Examination of the relationship between mathematical and critical thinking skills and academic achievement. Pedagogical Research, 9(1), em0176. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14028

Evayanti, M. (2017). Desain didaktis konsep garis dan sudut berdasarkan Realistic Mathematic Education (RME) pada pembelajaran matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) [Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. https://repository.upi.edu/33717/5/T_MTK_1503302

Facione, P. A. (1990). The California critical thinking skills test: College level. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.

Fadillah, R. N., Jatmiko, B., & Widodo, W. (2023). Critical Thinking Profile of Senior High School Students in terms of Argumentation-Based Learning. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v3i3.174

Farib, P. M., Ikhsan, M., & Subianto, M. (2019). Proses berpikir kritis matematis siswa sekolah menengah pertama melalui discovery learning. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6i1.21396

Faizah, S. N., & Sutarni, S. (2023). Investigasi kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah HOTS matematika. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 7(2), 1963-1975.

Fitria, N. A., Subandar, J., & Kadarisma, G. (2024). Proses berpikir kritis siswa ditinjau dari kemampuan awal matematis. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 7(4), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.32672/perisai.v3i1.464

Fitriani, D. A. (2022). Desain pembelajaran garis dan sudut kelas vii berbasis stem melalui lesson study untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Doctoral dissertation. Universitas PGRI Semarang

Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Gandi, A. S. K., Haryani, S., & Setiawan, D. (2021). The Effect of Project-Based Learning Integrated STEM Toward Critical Thinking Skill Article Info. Journal of Primary Education, 10(1), 18–23. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/33825

Glaser, E. M. (1972). An experiment in the development of critical thinking. AMS Press.

Gleason, N. W. (2018). Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. In Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0

Gravemeijer, K. (1999). Mathematical Thinking and Learning How Emergent Models May Foster the Constitution of Formal Mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(2), 155–177.

Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Local Instruction Theories as Means of Support for Teachers in Reform Mathematics Education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 105-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_3

Gravemeijer, K., & Eerde, D. Van. (2009). Design research as a means for building a knowledge base for teachers and teaching in mathematics education. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 510–524. https://doi.org/10.1086/596999

Gundumogula, M. (2020). Importance of Focus Groups in Qualitative Research. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 8. https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2020/v8/i11/HS2011-082

Gunhan, B. C. (2014). A case study on the investigation of reasoning skills in geometry. South African Journal of Education, 34(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15700/201412071156

Haddar, G. A. H., Hendriyanto, D., Munandar, H., & Kelibia, M. U. (2023). Analysis of the effectiveness of project steam-based learning model to improve students'critical thinking skills. Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(5), 10519-10525.

Hajizah, M. (2022). Desain tetrahedron didaktis pembelajaran fungsi dengan pendekatan realistik untuk mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir aljabar. Doctoral dissertation. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Halpern, D. F. (2012). Halpern critical thinking assessment: Test manual. Mödling, Austria: Schuhfried GmbH

Harnas, D. M., & Hidayati, A. (2021). Pengembangan LIT Topik-topik Keliling dan Luas Persegi Panjang Berbasis Pendekatan Realistic Mathematic Education di Sekolah Dasar. Basicedu, 5(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.567

Hariyanto, H., Yamtinah, S., Sukarmin, S., Saputro, S., & Mahardiani, L. (2019). Penerapan Model Project Based Learning (PJBL) Terintergrasi Pendekatan Stem Dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Peserta Didik di Salah Satu Sekolah Daerah Tangerang S. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, 2014, 256–261. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/snps/article/view/12848

Henriksen, D., Mehta, R., & Mehta, S. (2019). Design Thinking Gives STEAM to Teaching: A Framework That Breaks Disciplinary Boundaries. In M. . Knine & S. Areepattamannil (Eds.), STEAM Education: Teory and Practice (pp. 57–78). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_4

Hered, F., Bentri, A., Fauzan, A., & Fitria, Y. (2021). Pengembangan Local Instructional Theory Topik Perbandingan Berbasis Pendekatan RME di sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3321–3333. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1304

Hidajat, D. (2018). Analisis Kesulitan Dalam Penyelesaian Permasalahan Ruang Dimensi Dua. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Kudus), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.21043/jpm.v1i1.4452

Hollebrands, K. F. (2017). A framework to guide the development of a teaching mathematics with technology massive open online course for educator (mooc-ed). North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17219-2

Hollebrands, K., & Okumuş, S. (2018). Secondary mathematics teachers’ instrumental integration in technology-rich geometry classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 49, 82-94.

Ichsan, I., Mulyati, M., Duma, S. Y., & Nirfayanti, N. (2024). The effectiveness of mathematics learning with the STEAM approach in improving students’ critical thinking skills. Aksioma Education Journal. 1(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.62872/y2rh7g04

Indah, A. D., & Fauzan, A. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis peserta didik kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Payakumbuh menggunakan watson-glaser critical thinking appraisal. Jurnal Edukasi dan Kajian matematika. 8(3), 173-177.

Irawan, E. (2024). Keterampilan computational thinking mahasiswa melalui penerapan desain didaktis dengan memanfaatkan perangkat lunak-r pada mata kuliah statistika. Doctoral dissertation. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Irawan, T. A., Rahardjo, S. B., & Sarwanto. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VII-A SMP Negeri 1 Jaten. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains (SNPS), 21, 232–236. http://www.jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/snps/article/viewFile/11418/8103

Isnani, M. I., & Kadariisma, G. 2020. Analisis epistemological obstacles siswa SMA pada materi trigonometri. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif. 3(5), 547-558. DOI 10.22460/jpmi.v3i5.547-558.

Isnawan, G. M. (2023). Didactical Design Research. In Nashir Al-Kutub Indonesia (Issue August 2023). Nashir Al-Kutub Indonesia.

Isnawan, M. G., Alsulami, N. M., Bonyah, E., & Dejarlo, J. O. (2024). Pembelajaran Pola Bilangan di SMP: Sebuah Aktivitas Lesson Study Berbasis Bidactical Design Sesearch. Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 1–13. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/edumatica/article/view/28645/17921

Jansson, L. C. (1986). Logical reasoning hierarchies in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.17.1.0003

Johar, R., Aklimawati, A., Zubainur, C. M., Ikhsan, M. I. M., & Chandrawati, A. E. (2016). Pembelajaran Menemukan Nilai PHI (π) melalui Pendekatan Matematika Realistik di Sekolah Dasar. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(2), 199-207.

Juanti, S., Karolina, R., & Zanthy, L. S. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Pokok Bahasan Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Inovatif, 4(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i2.239-248

Kahfi, M., Ratnawati, Y., Setiawati, W., & Saepuloh, A. (2021). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Kontekstual Dengan Menggunakan Media Audiovisual Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Dan Prestasi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Ips Terpadu. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 7(1), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.36312/jime.v7i1.1636

Kant, I., Meiklejohn, J. M. D., Abbott, T. K., & Meredith, J. C. (1934). Critique of pure reason (p. 51). London: JM Dent.

Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2018). Gathering STE(A)M: Policy, Curricular and Programmatic Developments in Arts-based Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1407979

Kemendikbud. (2013). Desain induk kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Khaeriyah, D. Z. (2022). Desain pembelajaran bangun ruang sisi datar kelas viii berbasis stem melalui lesson study untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi numerik matematis siswa. Doctoral dissertation. Universitas PGRI Semarang.

Khine, M. S. (2019). STEAM Education. Theory and Practice. Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG

Kohar, A, W., Fachrudin, A. D., & Wadidah, S. (2021). Facilitating Students’ Multiple Intelligences through RME: A Learning Trajectory of Volume and Surface Area Measurement. Inomatika, 3(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika.v3i1.248

Krulik, S. dan Rudnick J.A.(1999). Innovative Tasks to Improve Critical and Creative Thinking Skills.Dalam Developing Mathematical Reasoning in Grade K-12. Stiff. L.V dan Curcio FR. Ed. 1999 Yearbook. Reston: NCTM,

Kuntze, S., Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Clarke, D. (2017). Hybrid task design: Connecting learning opportunities related to critical thinking and statistical thinking. ZDM, 49(6), 923-935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0874-4

Kurniasih, I. Y., Miskalena., & Ifwandi. (2017). Persepsi siswa terhadap upaya guru pendidikan jasmani olahraga dan kesehatan dalam memodifikasi media. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Jasmani, Kesehatan Dan Rekreasi, 3(3), 159–167.

Kushwaha, R. C., Chaurasia, P. K., & Singhal, A. (2014). Impact on Students’ Achievement in Teaching Mathematics Using Geogebra. 2014 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Technology for Education, 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2014.54

Laboy-Rush, D. (2011). Integrated STEM education through project-based learning. Learning.Com, 12(4), 1-12.

Lantakay, C. N., Senid, P. P., Blegur, I. K. S., & Samo, D. D. (2023). Hypothetical Learning Trajectory: Bagaimana Perannya dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar? Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 3(2), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.29303/griya.v3i2.329

Lefa, B. (2014). The Piaget Theory of coginitve development: and educational implications. Educational Psychology, 1(1), 1–8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265916960

Lestari, H., & Rahmawati, I. (2020). Integrated STEM through Project Based Learning and Guided Inquiry on Scientific Literacy Abilities in Terms of Self-Efficacy Levels. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 7(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v7i1.5883

Lisa Astriani, Abdul Mujib, & Firmansyah. (2022). Didactic Design for Overcoming Learning Obstacles in Mathematics of Junior High School Students. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 1(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v1i1.97

Maeda, J. (2013). Artists and scientists: More alike than different. Scientific American. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/artists-and-scientists-more-like-than-different/.

Manno, G. (2006). Embodiment and adidactical situation in the teachinglearning of the perpendicular straight lines concept. Disertasi. Departement of Didactic Mathematics Comenius University Bratislava.

Markham, T. (2012). STEM, STEAM, and PBL. Retrieved from http://edge.ascd.org/blogpost/stem-steam-and-pbl

Maulana, I., & Leonard. (2018). Pendekatan konstruktivisme dengan strategi pembelajaran tugas dan paksa. Peran Pendidikan Tinggi Dalam Bidang Kajian Pada Revolusi Industri 4.0, 1(1), 404–416. https://doi.org/10.31851/kalpataru.v4i1.2443

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis A methods sourcebook (3nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Miller, A. (2014). PBL and STEAM education: A natural fit. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/pbl-and-steam-natural-fit-andrew-miller

Morrison, J. (2006). STEM education monograph series: Attributes of STEM education. Teaching Institute for Essential Science, Baltimore, MD.

Moru, E. K. (2009). Epistemological obstacles in coming to understand the limit of a function at undergraduate level: a case from the national university of lesotho. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9143-x

Muin, A., & Fatma, M. (2021). Hypothetical learning trajectory design in development of mathematics learning didactic design in madrasah. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1836(1), 12070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012070

Mulyasa. 2013. Penilaian Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Yoshisuke, K. (2018). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skill of middle school through stem education project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10495

Nada, Q., Pramasdyahsari, A. S., & Albab, I. U. (2023). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning STEAM Berbantuan Geogebra Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung, 11(2), 85-92.

National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11625

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standars for school mathematics. USA: NCTM

NCTM. (2000). National Council of Teacher of Mathematics, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.

Novita, R., Prahmana, R. C. I., Fajri, N., & Putra, M. (2018). Penyebab kesulitan belajar geometri dimensi tiga. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.16836

Nurhikmayati, I. (2019). Implementasi STEAM Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Didactical Mathematics, 1(2), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.31949/dmj.v1i2.1508

Nurhikmayati, I., Kusumah, Y. S., & Darhim, D. (2024). Mathematical critical thinking skills through STEM/STEAM approach: A systematic literature review. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 35, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.810

Nurhikmayati, I., Priatna, N., Dahlan, J. A., & Minasyan, S. (2024). An ex post facto study of critical thinking skills in mathematics learning based on school geography. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v15i1.19330

Nurlaila. (2023). Peningkatan Kemampuan Guru dalam Penyusunan Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal (KKM) melalui Workshop (Kajian Tindakan di MTsN 2 Kota Lhokseumawe). ITQAN: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kependidikan, 14(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.47766/itqan.v14i1.664

Nurmalia, N. R., & Sari, C. K. (2023). Kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam memecahkan masalah HOTS. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 6(5), 2053–2064. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i5.19342

Nursyamsiah, G., Savitri, S., Yuspriyati, D. N., & Zanthy, L. S. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa SMP Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 7(1), 98–102. https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/jpmi/article/view/4037

Pagán Castaño, J., Arnal-Pastor, M., Pagán-Castaño, E., & Guijarro-García, M. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of the literature on critical thinking: an increasingly important competence for higher education students. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(2).

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Mehods (3nd ed.). California: Sage Publishing.

Permendikbudristek. (2022). Permendikbudristek No 21 Tahun 2022 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Pada Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah.

Plomp, T. (2006). Educational Design Research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Introducing Educational Design Research. Van Den, J Gravemeijer, K McKenney, S Nieveen, N (p. 163). Netzodruk, Enschede.

Prabawanto, S. (2018). The enhancement of students’ mathematical self-efficacy through teaching with metacognitive scaffolding approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012135

Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Design Research (Teori dan Implementasinya: Suatu Pengantar). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Pratiwi, A. N., Aisyah, N., Somakim, S., & Kamran, M. (2023). STEM-based approach: A learning design to improve critical thinking skills. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 225-237.

Prediger, S. (2019). Theorizing in design research. Avances de Investigación En Educación Matemática, 15, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i15.265

Presianawati, V., Saputro, B. A., & Handayani, D. E. (2022). Desain Didaktis Pembelajaran Rumus Luas Segi Empat Untuk Memfasilitasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Didaktis Indonesia, 2(1), 19–38.

Priatna, N., Lorenzia, S. A., & Muchlis, E. E. (2020). Pengembangan model project-based learning terintegrasi STEM untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa SMP. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan, 20(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v20i3.29636

Puspita, E., Suryadi, D., & Rosjanuardi, R. (2023). The Effectiveness of Didactic Designs for Solutions to Learning-Obstacle Problems for Prospective Mathematics Teacher Students: Case Studies on Higher-Level Derivative Concepts. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 15(3), 5-18.

Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). Finding the joy in the unknown”: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3, 1–17.

Rahmawati, Y., Hadinugrahaningsih, T., Ridwan, A., Palimbunga, U. S., & Mardiah, A. (2021). Developing the critical thinking skills of vocational school students in electrochemistry through STEM - project-based learning (STEM-PjBL). AIP Conference Proceedings, 2331(1), 40002. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041915

Rahmi, L., & Yulianti, K. (2022). Learning obstacles yang dihadapi siswa dalam memahami topik relasi dan fungsi. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 5(4), 929–940. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v5i4.929-940

Ramdaniah, M. (2020). Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Volume Kubus Dan Balok Melalui Pembuatan Bangun Ruang 3D Geogebra. JIRA: Jurnal Inovasi Dan Riset Akademik, 1(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.47387/jira.v1i4.55

Retnawati, H., Arlinwibowo, J., & Sulistyaningsih, E. (2017). The Student’s Difficulties In Completing Geometry Items Of National Examination. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (IJONTE), 8(4), 28–38. http://ijonte.org

Retno, E. W., Rochmad, & St. Budi Waluyo. (2018). Penilaian Kinerja Sebagai Alternatif Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 522–530. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/20134/9545

Risi, V. De. (2015). Mathematizing Space: The Objects of Geometry from Antiquity to the Early Modern Age. Birkhäuser.

Roberts, A., dan Cantu, D. 2012. Applying STEM instructional strategies to design and technology curricullum. Department of STEM education and profesional studies old dominion university. Norfolk, VA, USA.

Rohmah, N. Z., & Mashuri, M. (2021). Mathematical critical thinking ability in terms of mathematical anxiety in Smart Card assisted Brain-Based Learning model. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v10i1.41858

Rohmatunnisa, Z. J., Anita, I. W., Rohaeti, E. E., & Sariningsih, R. (2022). Analisis motivasi belajar siswa smp kelas VIII pada materi bangun ruang sisi datar berbantuan geogebra. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 5(4), 1061–1070. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v5i4.1061-1070

Rohmawati, A. (2015). Efektivitas pembelajaran. Jurnal pendidikan usia dini, 9(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPUD.091

Rusilowati, A. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Sebagai Alat Evaluasi Kesulitan Belajar Fisika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 1–10.

Rusydi, A., Yani, I., & Sagita, N. (2015). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Kelas Vi Sd Pada Materi Volume Kubus Dan Balok Dengan Menggunakan Alat Peraga Vokuba. Jurnal Pelangi, 8(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.22202/jp.2015.v8i1.337

Ruthven, K., Laborde, C., Leach, J., & Tiberghien, A. (2009). Design tools in didactical research: Instrumenting the epistemological and cognitive aspects of the design of teaching sequences. Educational researcher, 38(5), 329-342.

Ruthven, K. (2012). The didactical tetrahedron as a heuristic for analysing the incorporation of digital technologies into classroom practice in support of investigative approaches to teaching mathematics. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 44(5), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0376-8

Sachdeva, S., & Eggen, P.-O. (2021). Learners’ Critical Thinking About Learning Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0644. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11003

Salsabila, U. H., & Agustian, N. (2021). Peran Teknologi Pendidikan Dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Keislaman Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v3i7.3115

Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEM Mania. Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.

Sari, R. R., & Roesdiana, L. (2020). Analisis Learning Obstacle Siswa SMP Pada Materi Segiempat dan Segitiga. Prosiding Sesiomadika, 779–786.

Septiana, R., Febriarini, Y. S., & Zanthy, L. S. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Smp. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 2(6), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v2i2.68

Setiawati, A., Ajizah, D. N., Anisa, N. N., Ambarwati, P., Izzati, Z. A. N., & Erika, F. (2021). the 21St Century Skills on Chemistry Learning Based on Virtual Lab in Senior High School. JPPS (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains), 11(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v11n1.p27-39

Shadiq, F. (2019). Pembelajaran Matematika pada Era Industri 4.0. Suatu Tantangan Bagi Guru dan Pendidik Matematika. Seminar Nasional Kajian Pendidikan Matematika UMT. http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/cpu.v0i0

Sholihah, S. Z., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2018). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Proses Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tahapan Berpikir Van Hiele. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v6i2.317

Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy from a Constructivist Perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205

Simon, M. A. (2018). An emerging methodology for studying mathematics concept learning and instructional design. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 52(January), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.03.005

Siregar, K. D. P., Ramadhaniyati, R., Muhammad, I., & Triansyah, F. A. (2023). Analisis Bibliometrik: Fokus Kajian Critical Thinking pada Sekolah Menengah (1992-2023). EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v4i1.265

Sriraman, B., & English, L. D. (Eds.). (2010). Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 309-331). New York: Springer.

Starzinski, A. (2017). Foundational Elements of A Steam Learning Model For Elementary School. Dissertations. 4349. School of Education and Leadership Student Capstone: Hamline University.

Steinbring, H. (2005). The construction of new mathematical knowledge in classroom interaction: An epistemological perspective. New York: Springer.

Steinbring, H. (2005). Analyzing mathematical teaching-learning situations – the interplay of communicational and epistemological constraints. Educ. Stud. Math. 59,313–324. doi: 10.1007/s10649-005-4819-4

Stompff, G., Van, B. T., & Smulders, F. (2022). The generative dance of design inquiry: Exploring Dewey’s pragmatism for design research. Design Studies, 83, 101136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101136

Sumaji, S. (2019). Implementasi Pendekatan STEM Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika (SNAPMAT) (pp. 7-15).

Sunarsih, S., Yunarti, T., & Brarata, H. (2016). Desain didaktis matematika melalui metode socrates kontekstual untuk memfasilitasi kemampuan berpikir kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung2, 4(8), 1-14.

Supriadi, S. (2019). Didactic design of sundanese ethnomathematics learning for primary school students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 154-175.

Suryadi, D. (2011). Didactical Design Research (DDR) dalam Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika. Joint-Conference UPI-UTiM. April.

Suryadi, D. (2013). Didactical design research (DDR) dalam pengembangan pembelajaran matematika. In Prosiding seminar nasional matematika dan pendidikan matematika (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3-12).

Suryadi, D. (2019). Kajian Desain Didaktis (DDR) dan Implementasinya. Gapura Press.

Suryanto, A. (2012). Konsep dasar penilaian dalam pembelajaran. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Di SD, 5(1), 63.

Susanti, E., & Kurniawan, H. (2020). Design pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics). AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 37-52.

Susilo, B. E. (2017). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Materi Hal Sejajar, Bersilangan, Dan Tegak Lurus Dalam Mata Kuliah Geometri Ruang Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa. SOSIOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 3(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.30738/sosio.v3i2.1611

Syah Putri, L., & Pujiastuti, H. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita pada Materi Bangun Ruang. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 8(1), 65–74. http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/terampil/index

Tall, D. (1986). Using the computer as an environment for building and testing mathematical concepts: a tribute to richard skemp. Papers in Honour of Richard Skemp, 21–36.

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of the research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.bobpearlman.org/BestPractices/PBL_Research.pdf

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in our Times. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, A Wiley Imprint.

Utami, T. (2023). Profile of Students’ Critical Thinking Ability with Citatah Karst Damage as a Learning Source. Proceedings of International Conference on Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2009, 128–134.

Utari, E. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Berdasarkan Watson’s Error Category Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Model PISA Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Field dependent-Field Independent. Skripsi. Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Van De Walle, J. (2006). Matematika sekolah dasar dan menengah jilid 2 (keenam). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Wan, Z. H., So, W. M. W., & Hu, W. (2021). Necessary or sufficient? The impacts of epistemic beliefs on STEM creativity and the mediation of intellectual risk-taking. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 672–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1877368

Wang, Y., Hu, W., & Shen, J. (2019). Research on the teaching mode of junior middle school information technology based on critical thinking process. Proceedings - International Joint Conference on Information, Media, and Engineering, IJCIME 2019, 327–330. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCIME49369.2019.00072

Waruwu, L., Gulo, Y., Halawa, S., & Zalukhu, N. M. (2024). Analisis Mendalam terhadap Perubahan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa melalui Kurikulum Merdeka. Journal of Education Research, 5(3), 3783–3789. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i3.1329

Wastiani, R., Taufiq, M., & Wijaya, A. B. (2023). Pengaruh pendekatan STEAM berbasis project based learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan berpikir kritis pada mata pelajaran matematika SMP Labschool Cibubur. Jurnal Konatif. 1(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.62203/jkjip.v1i1.10

Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal: Forms A and B; Manual. Psychological Corporation.

Watson, A. D. (2015). Design thinking for life. Art Education, 68(3), 12–18.

Wijayanto, T., Supriadi, B., & Nuraini, L. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Dengan Pendekatan Stem Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Sma. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(3), 113. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpf.v9i3.18561

Winarni, J., Zubaidah, S., & H, S. K. (2016). STEM: apa, mengapa, dan bagaimana. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM (Vol. 1, pp. 976–984).

Wiryanto, W., Ainurrohmah, I., & Yasin, F. N. (2021). Keterlaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 Untuk Melatih Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Masa Pembelajaran Online Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Hasil Kajian, 7(3), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v7n3.p186-193

Yeany, R.H. & Miller, P.A. (1993). Effect of diagnostic remidial instruction on science learning: A meta analysis. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 20, 19-26

Zulfikar, H. A., Suryana, Y., & Lidinillah, A. M. (2018). Desain Didaktis Volume Kubus dan Balok untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Pedadidaktika: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 5(1), 62–73. http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/pedadidaktika/index

Aryanti, T., Adriany, V & Sukyadi, D. (2020). Kajian Kualitatif Konsep Dasar dan Isu Metodologis. Bandung: UPI Press.

Freudenthal, H. (1978). Weeding and sowing: Preface to a Science of Mathematical Education.Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.

Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S. & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). 2006. Educational design research. London: Routledge.

Bakker, A. (2004). Design Research in Statistics Education: On Symbolizing and Computer Tools, (Utrech: CD-β Press) h.37

Gravemeijer, Koeno & Van Erde, D. (2009). Design Research as a Means for Building a Knowledge Base for Teachers and Teaching in Mathematics Education. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 510-524. https://doi.org/10.1086/596999.

Plomp T, et al. (2013). Educational Desaign Research. Part A: An Introductron Netherlands. Enschede.

Prahmana, R.C.I. (2018). Design Research (Teori Implementasinya: Suatu Pengantar) Ed. 1. Depok: Rajawali Press.

Reeves, T., Herrington, J., and Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 97–116.

Van den Akker, J., Branch, R., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., and Plomp, T. (eds) (1999). Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Bakker, A., & Van Eerde, D. (2015). An introduction to design-based research with an example from statistics education. In Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 429-466). Springer, Dordrecht.

Bakker, A. (2018). Design research in education. Design research in education: A practical guide for early career researchers, 1, 3-22.

Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., et al. (2003). Design Experiments in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001

Gravemeijer, K. & Cobb, P. (2006). Design Research from a Learning Design Perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney & N. Nieveen (Eds). Educational Design Research. New york: Routledge

Jupri, A. (2008). Computational estimation in grade four and five: Design research in Indonesia. Utrecht, The Netherlands: The Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.

Kelly, A. (2003). Research as design. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–4.

Collins, A., Joseph, D. & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2

Doorman, M. (2019). Design and Research For Developing Instruction Theories. Avances de Investigación en Educación Matemática, 15, 29-42. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i15.266

Drijvers, P. H. M. (2003). Learning algebra in a computer algebra environment: Design research on the understanding of the concept of parameter. Utrecht, the Netherlands: CD-Beta Press.

Lantakay, C. N., Senid, P. P., Blegur, I. K. S., & Samo, D. D. (2023). Hypothetical Learning Trajectory: Bagaimana Perannya dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar?. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 3(2), 384-393.

Simon, M. A. (1995). Mathematic Pedagogy From A Constructivist Perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145.

Published

August 26, 2025

Details about the available publication format: Pratinjau Buku

Pratinjau Buku

Physical Dimensions

Details about the available publication format: Beli Buku

Beli Buku

Physical Dimensions